0 of 8 Questions completed
Questions:
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading…
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You must first complete the following:
0 of 8 Questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0)
Earned Point(s): 0 of 0, (0)
0 Essay(s) Pending (Possible Point(s): 0)
All trustees are acting in a fiduciary capacity and, not one trustee can hide behind the other. This principle was confirmed in:
Select the correct court case
In Land and Agricultural Bank of SA v Parker, the importance of separation between enjoyment and control was emphasised.
This means that: select the correct statement
In Coetzee v Peet Smith, the judgement held confirmed that:
Select the incorrect statement.
Is this statement true or false?
In the Land and Africultural Bak of SA V Parker, Section 12 of the Trust Property Act was confirmed.
S54 of the Administration of the Estates Act, authorises a court to remove an executor. The court can rely on this rule when the heirs and legatees are unhappy with the executor.
Would this reflect a correct analyses of the court case: Select the correct statement:
In one of the court cases below involved the selling of land. It was held that any deed of sale entered into by one or more trustees purporting to act on behalf of the other trustees, where those trustees were not authorised to act by their co-trustees, it will be deemed to be null and void.
The court case in relevance to this finding is: select the correct statements
It is true to say, which was confirmed in the Thorpe V Trittenwein case, that a trustee and beneficiary can be the same person as long as the very same trustee is also not the only beneficiary.